In the past few days, Screen Actors Guild members should have received the proposed contract covering TV and Theatrical (film) work. If you’re a member or can persuade someone who is, I urge you to vote NO on the proposed contract.
In the past few days, Screen Actors Guild members should have received the proposed contract covering TV and Theatrical (film) work. If you’re a member or can persuade someone who is, I urge you to vote NO on the proposed contract.
The Screen Actors Guild website has added several new video clips, including this 6-minute clip from William, from actors speaking out on the contract crisis currently facing members of the industry. William’s clip really lays out the reasons why Guild members need to fight for their rights now, why “temporarily” accepting the unacceptable is a path that cannot be reversed once taken, and what the short-and long-term implications will be if SAG members lose this battle.
The word “strike” is an alarming term and the reaction it brings is understandable, but it must be made clear that approving a strike authorization does NOT mean that a strike is inevitable. Guild members who lend their names to the Solidarity Campaign, and who vote “Yes” in support of a strike authorization, are merely arming the negotiating committee with the strength they need to have the talks continue.
Whether you are a SAG member or not, this is an issue that will touch us all in some way. Stay informed and aware by following developments on the official SAG website.
Los Angeles, December 12, 2008 —
Screen Actors Guild today announced the names of 30 recognizable members who, along with Guild national president Alan Rosenberg, signed SAG’s “Statement of Support.” The first signers include Mel Gibson, Ed Harris, Holly Hunter, Martin Sheen, Sandra Oh, Hal Holbrook, Dixie Carter, John Heard, Jerry O’Connell, Rob Morrow and 20 others. Guild secretary treasurer Connie Stevens and 1st national vice president Anne-Marie Johnson also signed on to the statement as did board members Elliott Gould, Frances Fisher, Valerie Harper, Robert Hays, Justine Bateman, Clancy Brown, Charles Shaughnessy, Scott Bakula, Diane Ladd and others.
The SAG “Statement of Support” reads:
“I support the Screen Actors Guild National Board of Directors request for members to vote YES to empower the National Board to decide whether to call a TV/Theatrical contract strike, and if so, determine its timeframe. We must arm our negotiating committee with the collective unity and strength of the Screen Actors Guild members.”
Holbrook, Asner, Sheen, Ladd, Fisher, and Stevens have recorded video testimonials and topical messages that will debut on Screen Actors Guild’s website next week along with other celebrity testimonials.
The Guild’s website now features video messages from Bateman, Shaughnessy and Brown prominently displayed in a homepage video viewer.
Initial signers include:
Ed Asner
Scott Bakula
Justine Bateman
Clancy Brown
Dixie Carter
George Coe
Anne DeSalvo
Frances Fisher
Mel Gibson
Brian Goodman
Elliot Gould
Ed Harris
Valerie Harper
John Heard
Robert Hays
Hal Holbrook
Holly Hunter
Anne-Marie Johnson
Diane Ladd
William Mapother
Kent McCord
Rob Morrow
Jerry O’Connell
Sandra Oh
Alan Rosenberg
Alan Ruck
Charles Shaughnessy
Martin Sheen
Connie Stevens
Renee Taylor
Alicia Witt
All SAG members are invited to sign the “Statement of Support” by emailing their name and member number to the email address contract2008@sag.org. (SAG is in the final programming stages of an online sign up form which will be put on the home page of the website.) Video statements of support are playing now at http://www.sag.org/.
The recent news of the upcoming SAG vote to obtain strike authorization has stirred up a great deal of concern and confusion among industry members and the general public. SAG leaders are making every effort to clear up the confusion and shed light on the realities of the situation; for his part, William had the following to say…
The Screen Actors Guild is sending a referendum to its members asking not for a strike, but for a strike authorization. This will allow SAG’s National Board to call a strike if and when it deems it necessary. What’s at stake is nothing less than the ability of current and future actors to make a living at their craft. This fight is not for the highest-paid stars, but for everyday actors who depend on the contract minimums to make their living.
As content moves to the Internet, the networks and studios are refusing to maintain the pay arrangment they’ve had with actors for decades. And the contract they’re offering SAG is not the same, incredibly, but worse than what was signed by writers, directors and the other actors union, AFTRA. Given the economy, the timing of this is very unfortunate, obviously, but the livelihood of all middle-class actors hangs in the balance.
In addition to throwing himself into the stage and screen roles that have brought his name and face into the public eye, William spends a great deal of time off-camera throwing himself into valuable projects and causes that are lower-profile but of the utmost importance to the people they impact. One of the affiliations that strikes closest to home for William is his work on the National Board of the Screen Actors Guild, which is quickly approaching a monumental vote and a contract negotiation that will shape the future of professional actors.
It has been one of the purposes of this blog to be a place where William could share his thoughts on the subjects that were important to him, to inform and educate the general public on the facts, and to help people understand why these causes need our collective awareness. Now, without further ado, a word from our sponsor…
For a former teacher and lifelong older brother, what’s better for my first post than a (brief!) lecture?
This coming weekend is, potentially, a historic one for the Screen Actors Guild. The National Board, of which I’m a member, will be meeting in Los Angeles. Topic A? The current negotiations for the contract which covers film and broadcast TV. The contract expired June 30th. Shooting has continued, but all SAG members are now working under the terms of the expired contract.
Negotiations began, ominously enough, on April 15. They continued more or less for several months, until the TV networks and movie studios (called, collectively, the “Producers”) made what they proclaimed their ‘final offer.’ Since then, they have refused to negotiate further.
This contract will be the first to regulate content over the Internet, and both sides are fully aware of its importance. For actors there are two primary Internet issues: Residuals (i.e., royalties, money owed actors — along with writers and directors — when shows are rerun), and Union Coverage (i.e., that all those who work under SAG contracts are members of the union).
Residuals make up anywhere from 25-50% of the annual income of most working actors. The Producers insist on paying little or no residuals for work shown on, and shot for, the Internet. Understandably, it seems to me, actors want to make a living through their work. The Producers apparently feel otherwise.
Union coverage is essential to keep actors protected. Without it, the Producers will develop and utilize non-union talent. The union talent will ultimately have no work, and the non-union talent will have no protection. On July 26, SAG’s National Board unanimously endorsed the following: “It is a core principle of Screen Actors Guild that no non-union work shall be authorized to be done under any SAG agreement.”
That’s it in a nutshell. The Internet is the near and present future. If our work for the Internet isn’t protected, working actors will not be able to make a living. It’s that simple. And there aren’t enough bars and restaurants to hire us all, trust me.
Okay, lecture over. An actor, a fireman, and a stripper walk into a bar…